![]() ![]() When Usher planned to make a new record after his third album, "8701", he decided to not branch out that much with musical collaborators and continue building music with his previous producers. The song was well-received by critics and garnered award nominations. ![]() "Burn" was certified platinum in Australia and gold in New Zealand and United States. The single topped various charts around the world, including the "Billboard" Hot 100 for eight non-consecutive weeks. The song was released as the second single from the album in July 2004. Originally planned as the album's lead single, "Burn" was pushed back after favorable responses for the song " Yeah!". "Burn" is about breakup in a relationship, and the public referred to it as an allusion to Usher's personal struggles. The song was produced by Dupri and Cox for Usher's fourth studio album " Confessions" (2004). ![]() " Burn" is an R&B- ballad song written by American singers-rappers and songwriters Usher, Jermaine Dupri and Bryan-Michael Cox. Producer = Jermaine Dupri, Bryan Michael Cox The plaintiff’s song, it’s pointed out, was a “random and unproven song buried on an album.” Further, they show the song got played on the radio around the nation just three times, twice in Chattanooga, Tennessee and once in Denver.Writer = Usher Raymond, Jermaine Dupri, Bryan-Michael Cox Usher says there was no attempt by the court to show access by anybody who had responsibility over “Burn,” as Warren G played no role in the song’s creation.Īs for “wide dissemination,” the defendants attempt to school the judge on the fact that an album isn’t a song. In papers to the court on Friday, Usher’s camp attacks these theories. As such, the judge says the song may have been heard by Usher because it was available through “wide dissemination.” Further, the judge did her own independent research and found Reel Tight’s album to have reached position 197 for a single week in 1999 on Billboard’s R&B/Hip Hop chart of top 200 albums. But she did rule it to be an issue of material fact whether a third-party intermediary, hip hop star Warren G, may have provided the link, having had mutual collaboration with both parties. In her decision, Judge Snyder didn’t buy the one about Usher and members of Reel Tight having much personal contact with each other. Straughter offered several theories, some more convincing than others. Leaving aside the issue of whether these songs sound alike, the big controversy at the moment in the lawsuit is whether Usher and Dupri had access to Straughter’s song. Here’s a YouTube clip of Usher’s “ Burn” and a clip of Reel Tight’s “ No More Pain.” Hard for us to hear significant resemblance, but an expert for the plaintiffs submitted a report that the two songs shared measurable similarities, including a “highly unusual” 18-bar introduction, musical instruments that enter at the exact same bars, similar guitar and vocal stylings, the pitches and phrasings of certain melodies, and other compositional congruity. To make the claims stick, Straughter needs to show two big elements – that the defendants had access to his work and there was substantial similarity in the songs. In the case, Straugther alleges he created a song entitled “The Reasons Why,” which showed up on an album by the R&B group Reel Tight under the name “No More Pain” in late 1998. District Court Judge Christina Snyder to reconsider her August order denying summary judgment. Robin Thicke on Cutting His Hair After First Radio Single, Turning a Bank Robbery Into a Song and Writing for Michael Jacksonīut before that happens, Usher’s camp is pleading with the judge to re-examine whether there was any chance he was familiar with Straughter’s work.Īttorneys for the defendants, including Usher, producer Jermaine Dupri, EMI April Music, Sony Music, Arista Records, and others filed a motion on Friday that asks U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |